Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Wolves de-listed

Discussion in 'Indiana Outdoor News' started by anon782010, Mar 12, 2007.

  1. Federal government relinquishing protection of wolf population

    The Associated Press - Sunday, March 11, 2007

    DULUTH, Minn.

    After three decades under the watchful eye of the federal government, the protection and management of wolves is falling back into the hands of the state and tribal governments.
    At 12:01 a.m. Monday, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service officially removes the western Great Lakes population of gray wolves from the federal list of threatened and endangered species. Shooting wolves will no longer be a federal offense, although state laws already in place mean it will still be illegal in most cases.
    The change comes about after a major rebound in the wolf population, particularly in Minnesota. Just 35 years ago, there were about 500 wolves estimated to roam northern Minnesota - the last timber wolves alive in the contiguous 48 states after they were shot, trapped and poisoned out of the rest of the country.
    Today, there are an estimated 3,000 wolves in Minnesota and another 500 each in Wisconsin and Michigan.
    The federal de-listing will make it easier for farmers, dog owners and government trappers to kill wolves. A farmer who sees a wolf threatening cattle can legally shoot it for the first time in 40 years.
    Animal rights groups continue to question the federal government's action, with the Humane Society of the U.S. arguing that the lines drawn for the Great Lakes region are arbitrary and don't mean wolf populations have been fully restored to their former range.
    "We believe it's a bad decision with many flaws," said John Lovvorn, vice president for litigation for the Humane Society. The group has filed a federal notice of intent to sue the Fish and Wildlife Service for the de-listing, although Lovvorn said no decision to sue has yet been made.
    Lovvorn concedes that there is no longer the kind of anti-wolf sentiment that existed in the decades leading up to the animal's placement on the endangered list.
    "It's been quiet" compared to disputes as recently as the late 1990s between landowners and the government over wolves, said Mike DonCarlos, wildlife research and policy manager for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
    Janet McNally, a livestock farmer near Hinckley, was a vocal critic of government wolf management in the late '90s, saying it didn't do enough to reduce wolf numbers in farm regions. She said the state takeover of the population is more a symbolic change than anything.
    "The ability to shoot a wolf on sight is more to offer farmers a little feeling of control than any real control," McNally said. "Ive been surrounded by wolves here for years and have only seen one maybe three times. And I never had the opportunity to kill one."
  2. This happened today? I recieved an email from the American Hunting Association about a month ago that gave me this news. I thought they had allready been taken off.

  3. They have been talking about this for some time. I think that this is just the "Official" announcement.

    Leave it to the Humane Society to throw a wet blanket over what should be celebrated as a conservation victory. They just don't get it.
  4. I think the humane society should trap the wolves and neuter them while they are awake. That would change their thinking. Or maybe put a big thick steak around their necks and see how thes pretty animals kill and then ask their opinion.